Las cookies nos ayudan a ofrecer nuestros servicios. Al utilizar nuestros servicios, aceptas el uso de cookies.
De En Es
Kundenservice: +49 (0) 551 - 547 24 0

Editorial Cuvillier

Publicaciones, tesis doctorales, capacitaciónes para acceder a una cátedra de universidad & prospectos.
Su editorial internacional especializado en ciencias y economia

Editorial Cuvillier

Premiumpartner
De En Es
Titelbild-leitlinien
On Assumptions and Hypotheses in Mathematising by Tasks without Numbers

Impresion
EUR 65,45

E-Book
EUR 45,80

On Assumptions and Hypotheses in Mathematising by Tasks without Numbers

Roxana Grigoras (Autor)

Previo

Indice, PDF (120 KB)
Lectura de prueba, PDF (270 KB)

ISBN-13 (Impresion) 9783736996311
ISBN-13 (E-Book) 9783736986312
Idioma Inglés
Numero de paginas 254
Laminacion de la cubierta mate
Edicion 1.
Lugar de publicacion Göttingen
Lugar de la disertacion Bremen
Fecha de publicacion 29.09.2017
Clasificacion simple Tesis doctoral
Area Pedagogía aplicada, Didáctica
Matemática
Palabras claves modelling, mathematics, tasks, numbers
Descripcion

When seen as problem solvers of apparently non-mathematical tasks, i.e. tasks without numbers, students mathematise, thus translate text into mathematics. While doing that within groups, they discuss and controvert, by expressing statements in form of assumptions and hypotheses. Beginner and experienced modellers show different working behaviours when investigating how students’ perform three main modelling tasks. Epistemic actions within the mathematical modelling cycle, with RBC and SDDS models on a micro-level provide the theoretical framework based on which actions of students are empirically observed and separated into “mathematical world” and “real world”. An extended categorisation of the assumptions related to the characteristics of the modelling process and a rough differentiation of hypotheses mainly according to the epistemic actions involved are proposed as results of the study. A generic levelling of students’ modelling competencies is also developed, being supported by empirical evidence, but also by normative settlings.