Las cookies nos ayudan a ofrecer nuestros servicios. Al utilizar nuestros servicios, aceptas el uso de cookies.

Editorial Cuvillier

Publicaciones, tesis doctorales, capacitaciónes para acceder a una cátedra de universidad & prospectos.
Su editorial internacional especializado en ciencias y economia

Editorial Cuvillier

De En Es
 Adorno’s Nonidentical and Derrida’s Différance

Impresion
EUR 65,90

E-Book
EUR 39,50

Adorno’s Nonidentical and Derrida’s Différance (Tienda española)

For a Resurrection of Negative Dialectics

Stefan Zenklusen (Autor)

Previo

Lectura de prueba, PDF (240 KB)
Indice, PDF (190 KB)

ISBN-13 (Impresion) 9783736973046
ISBN-13 (E-Book) 9783736963047
Idioma Inglés
Numero de paginas 182
Laminacion de la cubierta mate
Edicion 01
Lugar de publicacion Göttingen
Fecha de publicacion 06.11.2020
Clasificacion simple Libro de divulgacion
Area Filosofía
Filosofía sistemática
Ciencias sociales
Sociología
Palabras claves Nichtidentisches, Nonidentical, Différance, Negative Dialektik, Negative Dialectics, Identität, Identity, Differenz, Difference, Dekonstruktion, Deconstruction, Kritische Theorie, Critical Theory, Phänomenologie, Phenomenology, Immantenismus, Immanentism, Poststrukturalismus, Post-structuralism, Logozentrismus, Logocentrism, Phonozentrismus, Phoncentrism, Sozialdarwinismus, Social Darwinism, Neoliberalismus, Neoliberalism, Adorno, Derrida, Husserl, Heidegger, Bourdieu, Hegel
Descripcion

The virulent anti-Hegelianism of French poststructuralism and its (difficult) confrontation with Jürgen Habermas has long obscured the closeness of Jacques Derrida’s “différance” to Theodor W. Adorno’s “Nonidentical.” Taking the overarching theme of “identity and difference” as a guide, we can peel apart what unites and separates these two thinkers. In so doing, certain “de-realizing” effects of Derrida’s entrapment in signs reveal themselves. By contrast, Adorno’s social and cultural diagnosis, when extrapolated to a post-Fordian context is astonishingly fruitful. Attempts to trivialize negative dialectics as a model of intellectual self-understanding from a past age or as an esthetic reserve of ways of life are untenable.