Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Cuvillier Verlag

Publications, Dissertations, Habilitations & Brochures.
International Specialist Publishing House for Science and Economy

Cuvillier Verlag

De En Es
 Adorno’s Nonidentical and Derrida’s Différance

Hard Copy
EUR 65.90

E-book
EUR 39.50

Adorno’s Nonidentical and Derrida’s Différance (English shop)

For a Resurrection of Negative Dialectics

Stefan Zenklusen (Author)

Preview

Extract, PDF (240 KB)
Table of Contents, PDF (190 KB)

ISBN-13 (Hard Copy) 9783736973046
ISBN-13 (eBook) 9783736963047
Language English
Page Number 182
Lamination of Cover matt
Edition 01
Publication Place Göttingen
Publication Date 2020-11-06
General Categorization Non-Fiction
Departments Philosophy
Systematic philosophy
Social sciences
Sociology
Keywords Nichtidentisches, Nonidentical, Différance, Negative Dialektik, Negative Dialectics, Identität, Identity, Differenz, Difference, Dekonstruktion, Deconstruction, Kritische Theorie, Critical Theory, Phänomenologie, Phenomenology, Immantenismus, Immanentism, Poststrukturalismus, Post-structuralism, Logozentrismus, Logocentrism, Phonozentrismus, Phoncentrism, Sozialdarwinismus, Social Darwinism, Neoliberalismus, Neoliberalism, Adorno, Derrida, Husserl, Heidegger, Bourdieu, Hegel
Description

The virulent anti-Hegelianism of French poststructuralism and its (difficult) confrontation with Jürgen Habermas has long obscured the closeness of Jacques Derrida’s “différance” to Theodor W. Adorno’s “Nonidentical.” Taking the overarching theme of “identity and difference” as a guide, we can peel apart what unites and separates these two thinkers. In so doing, certain “de-realizing” effects of Derrida’s entrapment in signs reveal themselves. By contrast, Adorno’s social and cultural diagnosis, when extrapolated to a post-Fordian context is astonishingly fruitful. Attempts to trivialize negative dialectics as a model of intellectual self-understanding from a past age or as an esthetic reserve of ways of life are untenable.