Our cumulative dissertations are based on the publication of several scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals. This process ensures an independent evaluation by multiple experts who assess the quality, relevance, and originality of the articles.
In contrast to monographic dissertations, which are usually evaluated only by the supervisor, cumulative dissertations undergo quality control by at least three reviewers per article. This guarantees an objective and transparent assessment.
To support this, our publishing house conducts an internal preliminary review, where experienced supervisors examine the articles before submission. The final evaluation of the dissertation is based on the peer-reviewed status of the published articles. If some articles have not yet been published, a supplementary review takes place.