| Departments | |
|---|---|
| Book Series (99) |
1415
|
| Nachhaltigkeit |
3
|
| Gesundheitswesen |
3
|
| Humanities |
2410
|
| Medienwissenschaften | 17 |
| Theology | 57 |
| Philosophy | 103 |
| Law | 430 |
| Economics | 863 |
| Social sciences | 423 |
| Sports science | 48 |
| Psychology | 233 |
| Educational science | 190 |
| History | 194 |
| Art | 111 |
| Cultural studies | 167 |
| Literary studies | 118 |
| Linguistics | 90 |
| Natural Sciences |
5428
|
| Engineering |
1820
|
| Common |
97
|
|
Leitlinien Unfallchirurgie
5. Auflage bestellen |
|
Extract, PDF (120 KB)
Table of Contents, PDF (120 KB)
This study examines the relationship between tax law and substantive law as well as the constitutional limits of regulatory taxation. Its central question is whether the Basic Law contains a binding principle of the tax state, according to which the financing of state functions must, as a rule, be effected through taxes.
The analysis concludes that the principle of the tax state is to be recognised only as a constitutional guiding idea, not as a normative principle. Non-tax levies and regulatory tax provisions are therefore, in principle, equally permissible. Their constitutional legitimacy is determined by the general standards of fundamental rights, in particular by Art. 3 (1) of the Basic Law. On the basis of these criteria, the CO₂ levy under the BEHG (Fuel Emissions Trading Act), among others, is assessed as constitutional during its introductory phase and within the envisaged price corridor.
The approach thus affords the legislature a broad, yet at the same time fundamental-rights-limited, scope for shaping tax-based and non-tax-based regulatory instruments.
| ISBN-13 (Hard Copy) | 9783689525989 |
| ISBN-13 (eBook) | 9783689525996 |
| DOI | 10.61061/ISBN_9783689525989 |
| Final Book Format | A5 |
| Language | German |
| Page Number | 252 |
| Lamination of Cover | matt |
| Edition | 1. |
| Publication Place | Göttingen |
| Publication Date | 2026-08-13 |
| General Categorization | Dissertation |
| Departments |
Law
|
| Keywords | Steering through levies, General principle of equality (Art. 3 para. 1 GG), Equality of fiscal burden among those liable to pay levies, User charge, Management regime, Federal state principle, Fuel Emissions Trading Act (BEHG), CO₂ pricing, Prerogative of assessment, Financial constitution, Consequential constitution, Binding and strict adherence to prescribed forms, Fee state, Legislature's freedom of design, Equal rank of types of levies, Basic order, Climate protection (Art. 20a GG), Cost-coverage principle, Ability-to-pay principle, Steering levy sui generis, Steering purpose, Non-tax levies, Ordering function of the financial constitution, Policing costs of high-risk matches, Framework order, Rule-of-law principle, Sec. 4 para. 4 BremGebBeitrG, Protective and limiting function of the financial constitution, Welfare-state principle, Special levy, Tax norm with a steering purpose, Special tax-law dogmatics, Tax state principle, Separation of state and economy, Constitutional interpretation, Proportionality review, Concession fee, Benefit-skimming levy, Completeness of the budget, Priority of tax law over substantive law |